Monday, 19 October 2015

Lev Vygotski's scaffolding and his Zone of Proximal development

His theory of the "Zone of Proximal Development" (ZPD), "Proximal" simply means "next". He observed that when children were tested on tasks on their own, they rarely did as well as when they were working in collaboration with an adult. It was by no means always the case that the adult was teaching them how to perform the task, but that the process of engagement with the adult enabled them to refine their thinking or their performance to make it more effective. For him, the development of language and articulation of ideas was central to learning and development. The common-sense idea which fits most closely with this model is that of "stretching" learners.
Full development of the ZPD depends upon full social interaction. The range of skill that can be developed with adult guidance or peer collaboration exceeds what can be attained alone. Vygotsky's theory was an attempt to explain consciousness as the end product of socialization. For example, in the learning of language, our first utterances with peers or adults are for the purpose of communication but once mastered they become internalized and allow "inner speech".

Principles:
  1. Cognitive development is limited to a certain range at any given age.
  2. Full cognitive development requires social interaction.
zone of proximal development



















Bibliography:
http://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/social-development.html
http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/constructivism.htm#Vygotsky 

Jean Piaget- Cognitive Theory

According to Piaget, children are born with a very basic mental structure (genetically inherited and evolved) on which all subsequent learning and knowledge is based.
There Are Three Basic Components To Piaget's Cognitive Theory:
  1. Schemas (building blocks of knowledge)
  2. Adaptation processes that enable the transition from one stage to another (equilibrium, assimilation and  accommodation).
  3. Stages of  Development:
    • Sensorimotor (birth - 2 years): When children differentiate themselves from objects. Recognises self as agent of action and begins to act intentionally: e.g. pulls a string to set mobile in motion or shakes a rattle to make a noise. Achieves object permanence: realises that things continue to exist even when no longer present to the sense
    • Preoperational (2-7 years): Learns to use language and to represent objects by images and words. Thinking is still egocentric: has difficulty taking the viewpoint of others  Classifies objects by a single feature: e.g. groups together all the red blocks regardless of shape or all the square blocks regardless of colour
    • Formal operational (7-11 years): Can think logically about objects and events Achieves conservation of number (age 6), mass (age 7), and weight (age 9)
      Classifies objects according to several features and can order them in series along a single dimension such as size.
    • Concrete operational (11 and up): Can think logically about abstract propositions and test hypotheses systemtically, becomes concerned with the hypothetical, the future, and ideological problems 

Theories:

  
  
Adaptation What it says: adapting to the world through assimilation and accommodation.
Classification The ability to group objects together on the basis of their common features. 
Class Inclusion The understanding, more advanced than simple classification, that some classes or sets of objects are also sub-sets of a larger class. (E.g. there is a class of objects called dogs. There is also a class called animals. But all dogs are also animals, so the class of animals includes that of dogs) 
Conservation The realisation that objects or sets of objects stay the same even when they are changed about or made to look different. 
DecentrationThe ability to move away from one system of classification to another one as appropriate.
Egocentrism The belief that you are the centre of the universe and everything revolves around you: the corresponding inability to see the world as someone else does and adapt to it. Not moral "selfishness", just an early stage of psychological development. 
Operation The process of working something out in your head. Young children (in the sensorimotor and pre-operational stages) have to act, and try things out in the real world, to work things out (like count on fingers): older children and adults can do more in their heads. 
Schema (or scheme) The representation in the mind of a set of perceptions, ideas, and/or actions, which go together. In more simple terms Piaget called the schema the basic building block of intelligent behavior – a way of organizing knowledge. It is useful to think of schemas as “units” of knowledge, each relating to one aspect of the world, including objects, actions and abstract concepts.
Stage A period in a child's development in which he or she is capable of understanding some things but not others 

Terminology:
Asmmilation: The process by which a person takes material into their mind from the environment, which may mean changing the evidence of their senses to make it fit.
Accommodation: The difference made to one's mind or concepts by the process of assimilation.
Note that assimilation and accommodation go together: you can't have one without the other.
 
Bibliography:

Tuesday, 13 October 2015

Sample Methodology Paragraph

Investigation Title: How does language change as children grow up?
For my investigation I intend to visit a primary school in order to get some data in which I will use for my investigation. I will do this by separating different classes into three groups, the first group will be made up of 6 girls, the second group will be 6 boys and the third group will consist of 3 boys and 3 girls, for the last group I will randomly select 4 from each group to make my investigation more reliable. By separating the groups like this I can clearly see how different each of the groups speak between each other when the other sex isn't there, this will be interesting to analyse and see after my investigation. Each group would then have to take part in an activity which involves 3 pictures being placed in front of them (some of the pictures will be stereotypically mostly aimed at females other at males, and one will be a gender neutral image) once the pictures are in front of them, I would like the children to talk about them, while they do this I will record them speaking. Every group will be presented with the same 3 images. I will then repeat this experiment for ages 4, 7 and 9 this will hopefully give me accurate comparability data to support my investigation about 'how language begins to affect gender?'. From my recordings I will then annotate any stereotypical language use for both males and females as well as annotating some theories from Deborah Tanning (including overlapping, length of sentences and pauses, tag questions, number of speaking turns taken, politeness and formalities) I think this will especially be seen when both sexes are speaking between each other. After I have done this, I intend to analyse my annotated phrases and then explain the effect that the language is having and how language is changing as children grow up. My only concerns are if only certain members of the group are speaking so I will not get a variety of language to analyse. To make my data as accurate as possible I will not direct the conversation only encourage it by trying to get the children to elaborate on their points if the conversation is quite and would limit my data, however I dont want to talk too much as this may decrease the reliability of my data. I could write some prompts for them to use, or circle specific things in the pictures for them to comment on, this would mean I would talk less but I would be directing the conversation. Therefore, I will only write 3 senetnces for each picture that will not highlight anything in specific, the children will then be able to awnser the questions and give me reliable data for me to use.

Friday, 9 October 2015

Investigation 1


Mini investigation:

Hypothesis:

Positive reinforcement will have a positive effect on the behaviour of the child, centred on Skinner's theory ‘Operant Conditioning’.

Introduction:

I have chosen to explore child directed speech and how this affects the child. My data has come from the ‘All the things’ video, where Evie’s Grandmother constantly rewards Evie’s with positive reinforcement. The transcript for the video lasts for 2 minutes and I will use this data to support my hypothesis as well as collecting data that contradicts with my hypothesis to compare with.
PEE Paragraph:

Some of the evidence that I have found supports my hypothesis, for example:
E          picture [pɪʧɘ] of me
G         yeah it is a picture of you (.) hahaha that’s a lovely smile (.) right now what else shall we do?
E          that nice
G         that’s lovely
E          (inaudible) …smile
G         it is nice smiling (.) hahaha
E          I smile
G         you are sm-
E          (inaudible)
G         ah you’re smiling a nice smile (.) now who else shall we get from this house?
In this sample the grandmother is providing Evie with positive reinforcement and Evie searching for praise after receiving some she continues to smile, Evie keeps saying "smile" which makes her grandmother laugh. By carrying on smiling most likely due to the comments and the reaction she is receiving, Evie then ignores her grandmothers attempt to change the topic by asking her Evie a question and continues to smile "hahaha that's a lovely smile (.) right now what else shall we do?", because of the grandmothers reaction of praise and laughter. She then repeats this hoping to receive more praise from her grandmother, she repeats this  a further four times.  Only 9% of the grandmothers language is interrogatives, she is taking cues from Evie and is questioning them, only a small amount of her language is actually telling Evie what to do, Evie mainly chooses what she does depending on the reaction she receives.

Analysis:

My data is unreliable as I only have data from child, this means that I can’t compare how other parents or carers speak to their children and only how Evie’s Grandmother speaks to her. This gives me little context and comparability data beyond the recordings of the participations relationship. 

Conclusion and Evaluation:

After looking at my data, my hypothesis is correct, when Evie is being rewarded for her positive behaviour we can see she repeats it as she wants more praise from her grandmother (when smiling).However, there are many limitations to my investigation, one being how Evie’s behaviour has already been affected by her parents and we don’t know how the Grandmother has affected the language (especially if the grandmothers language is different from her parents). As well as, isn’t the lack of data I had to begin with and then the limiting comparability data that I have overall. Also there may have been the observes paradox where Evie possibly controlled what she said and stopped herself from saying/doing what she wanted.

Thursday, 8 October 2015

Evie Transcript Work


To what extent is this an example of child led discourse? What is characteristic of the two participant’s language?

Evie is being recorded by her grandmother while playing with her toys, she is 2 years and 7 months old and is in her ‘telegraphic /post telegraphic stage’. This is an example of child led discourse because Evie is the one who chooses topics but her grandmother is encouraging her to speak by asking her tag questions as well as trying to make her elaborate on what she’s saying; she asks her basic questions like ‘what’s that? (2) Who is it?’ the two second pause indicates that Evie is thinking about what to say and is trying to find her words, so the grandmother rephrased the question to a different one. Evie doesn’t finish her words or sentences and has long pauses sometimes but her grandmother tries to finish them for her (encouraging her to practise to use more words) e: ‘(2) gon (.) get (.) out now’ and g: ’he wants to get out okay’ her grandmother is trying to encourage her interaction with adults around her to support her language development (LASS- Language Acquisition Support System). At the start of the transcript we can see that Evie uses very simple language due to her age, she mainly starts off with using just nouns to communicate with her grandmother and misses some prepositions and throughout this conversation Evie doesn’t really look at who she is speaking to (her grandmother) and seems like she is almost just talking to herself, this is shown in: e: ‘(2) one two’ g: two cats (2) how many things have we got now in the picture?’, as shown previously her grandmother is again trying to teach Evie, but this time she’s teaching her how to count. To show she is still in the telegraphic stage Evie makes a grammatical error which she ‘no put it all’, but I think she means that she has got it all. She frequently uses action words like ‘go’ and ‘now’ to communicate with her grandmother what she means. Evie also uses may phonemic expansions and contractions showing how she is trying to practice her language and experiment with sounds (examples: ‘sho-o-o-w’ – phonemic expansion and ‘gon’ – meaning going to, phonemic contraction).
Answers to questions:
1) There are four different pronunciations that Evie uses to say ‘picture: picture [pɪʧɪt], picture of [pit ɘv], picture of [pɪtɘ], picture [pɪʧɘ]. All her pronunciations start with ‘pi’ but some of them contain an ‘f’ sound or other sounds which wouldn’t normally be found in ‘picture’. However some of the sounds found in ‘picture’ she does use but says them in the wrong order.
2) Throughout the transcript Evie’s grandmother tries to encourage her to speak by using tag questions and trying to get Evie to elaborate on what she’s saying. As well as trying to get her to engage with the conversation by giving her ‘activities’ or tasks she can do. Overall, the grandmother uses 57 things to encourage Evie to speak and support her talking.
3) The grandmother is encouraging Evie to speak by adding questions and trying to engage her more into the conversation ‘how many? Count them’ she uses a forceful verb to try and get her to develop her language and mathematic skills.
4) Overall, the out of the 51 utterances Evie’s Grandmother makes 34 of them are questions; the main functions of Evie’s grandmother asking questions are to encourage her to speak and to encourage her to elaborate on what she says and sometimes to guide the conversation into a certain direction.
5) The misunderstanding was that Evie went to look and find the actual bath tub that’s in the house, when instead her Grandmother meant the toy one in the wooden house.
6) The switches between the real and play world are interesting because Evie could possibly be unaware about the toy world and she is incorporating her knowledge about what she uses and then assumes that everything else could do the same thing as her and have the same needs.
7) As Evie is aware of the camera she may have the observer’s paradox which can change her language and she may be more conscious of her language and become a little bit nervous. This could have the effect that some of the things she says are unusual or she says less because the camera is watching her, although behind the camera is her grandmother who she acts comfortable around- which might bring up her confidence.
8) Evie says ‘kangaroo’ in four different ways: kangaroo [kænɪru:], kangaroo [kænɘru:], kangaroo [kæmɘrɒn], kangaroo [kæŋru:]. I agree with the statements ‘trying to get it right’ and ‘creative experimentation with sounds and words’ because she is in the telegraphic stage, Evie still needs help pronouncing some words but gets on well with other words. She needs to practise saying these words more so next time she will get it right.
9) The non-standards forms of English that Evie uses like ‘fings’ and ‘a-coming’ can be associated with the Durham accent.
10) Evie is in the telegraphic stage which means she is still learning language and still sometimes gets things wrong because she is learning but she’s still trying to develop her language.



Friday, 2 October 2015

Methodology Plan

Investigation: When does language begin to affect gender?


Data collection:
  • Variety of different age groups that can show a possible change in language
  • I am going to collect data from boys and girls ages 4/7/9/12
  • I'm going to record 8 girls/boys from each age group (this will give me reliable comparisons as well as a big enough sample data to make it reliable
  • I am going to record children speaking, to do this I am going to present them with the same images to try and encourage conversation)
  • The boys and girls will both be shown the same images and hopefully be around the same table so I can clearly see how boys and girls speak when they are around each other
  • I may record the boys speaking with each other and then record the girls speaking with each other and then record both genders speaking
Data processing:
  • I will analyse the (from my recordings) the typical gender language from Deborah Tanning
  • Including: length of sentences, length of pauses, length of text in words, number of speaking turns, number of interruptions, tag questions
Problems:
  • Some children may be shy and not want to speak
  • May be overlapping, so I wouldn't be able to understand clearly from my recordings what some children were saying
  • Possible friendships between some children may encourage the speaking of certain people and not others

Monday, 28 September 2015

Coursework Ideas:

One of my hypothesis': Compare language from children and see how girls and boys speak differently and how gender affects their language
- I will conduct a experiment by printing some pictures which would stereotypically appeal to girls and other pictures for boys (including pictures of fairy's, enchanted forests, football matches ect.)
- I aim to get pictures that have lots of detail in them to encourage conversation, I will record their conversations and then compare language
- I am going to collect my data from a local Brownies unit (which would be girls aged 5-7- around 20) and visit a primary school and do the same experiment on a group of boys
- I will experiment on ages 5/9/12
- I expect the children to act differently while I'm recording them because of the observers paradox but I am going to try to make them feel more comfortable and ask them questions to encourage conversation
- The data will help me evaluate my hypothesis
My other hypothesis: Different language used in CBBC, CBB's, BBC and compare how language changes to suit the target age group (I would be exploring CLA, gender as well as power)
- Collect the data by watching the shows and then record voices and type it up
- Compare language and how each one changes, I could also compare different speakers from different genders too (female and male presenter from CBBC, female and male presenter CBB's, female and male presenter from BBC)

Sunday, 6 September 2015

Child Language Acquisitions

The Major Theories:
  • The behavioural approach: Watson and Skinner
  • The inate approach: Chomsky- Universal Grammar
  • The interactionist approach
The behavioural approach
Children learn primarily by coping the language they hear around them. They also begin to associate sounds with situations , eventually the child will begin to imitate some of the sounds.
Beliefs: Behaviourists claim that language is learnt through imitation and repetition.
 
 The inate approach
When children are exposed to speech parts of the brain and they try and make sense of sounds and utterances (reinforcement has little effect).
Beliefs: The brain has the primary responsibility for language learning. Innatives believe that grammar is in our brains at birth and that we spend the rest of our lives rediscovering it. Connectionists believe that we pick up the grammar through connections and events after birth.

The interactionist approach
Is when the brain plays a part in trying to understand what's around them but it requires a social and linguistic environment, working with others speeds up the learning.
Piaget's developmentalist approach
A theory which suggests that ties the language learning to the physical growth of the body and the cognitive growth of the brain. Children can only correctly use language when they've experienced it e.g. cognstively aware of short, long, light, heavy.
Connections:
Language is learnt by making meaningful connections
Beliefs: Interactionists place emphasis in language learning on the social interactions as children grow. Developmentalists feel language is learnt as the brain becomes aware of the related concepts.
 
Bruner and Language:
  • Enactive Stage (0-1 years) : Knowledge is stored in the form of motor responses. Children need to have real first hand experiences to help their thought process to develop
  • Iconic Stage (1-6 years) : Knowledge is stored primarily in the form of visual images, children need to be reminded of their prior experiences through illustrations, diagrams in books.
  • Symbolic Stage (7 onwards) : Knowledge is stored primarily as words, symbols and codes, helping to understand arbitrary ideas (beauty)
McREL: The Five Stages of Second Language Acquisition
  • Stage 1- Preproduction: Minimal comprehension, does not verbalise, nods and points
  • Stage 2 - Early production: Limited comprehension, one or two word response, key words, present tense
  • Stage 3 - Speech Emergence: Good comprehension, simple sentences, grammatical errors, frequent misunderstood colloquialisms
  • Stage 4 - Intermediate Fluency: Excellent comprehension, few grammatical errors
  • Stage 5 - Advanced Fluency: Near native level of speech

Spelling

1960-70
Frank Smith said that as children learn to talk by talking they learn to read by reading. He said that reading should not be broken down into component parts and children should not be presented with contrived or over simplified texts.
The reader has 2 basic needs:
  • The availability of interesting material that makes sense to the reader.
  • An understanding and more experienced reader as a guide.
Psycholinguists explained that readers draw upon the following cue systems when making sense of texts:
  • Semantic cues – using knowledge and experience of stories to predict events, phrases and words.
  • Syntactic cues – drawing on knowledge and experience of patterns in oral and written language to predict text.
  • Grapho-phonic cues – using knowledge and experience of relationships between sounds and symbols to read particular words.
1980s
Growing emphasis on home-school links, children’s knowledge of literacy before schooling and contributions made by all parents.Ÿ
A research programme in Bristol found clear evidence that listening to stories was one of the most significant pre-school experiences associated with children’s development as readers and writers.
When an adult reads to a child it is normal for the child to ask questions and make comments about the pictures, the print and the nature of the text itself. Through this talk children come to know more about what is involved in becoming a reader.
Popular texts tend to share:
  • a strong story
  • a lively, rhythmical text
  • powerful, imaginative content
  • memorable language
  • interesting illustrations that complement the text
  • humour
  • language that is not contrived or unnatural
  • As well as published texts children’s own texts play a powerful role in developing reading ability. These texts are often made into books and become a valuable part of the classroom’s reading resources.
Reading aloud
A child who is read to frequently builds up a repertoire of known texts which will be returned to again and again. On each occasion the child plays a more active role in the reading, predicting and re-enacting of the text. This familiarisation helps the child develop a growing awareness of what is involved in becoming a reader.
Silent reading
Usually during the infant stage the child moves from reading aloud to reading silently. In the initial stages the child sub-vocalises the words, reading at the same pace as if s/he were reading aloud. With experience the words become ‘thoughts in the head’ and the rate of reading increases.
Phonics
The phonics approach to learning to read is now very popular. It involves teaching children the relationship between letters and sounds, so that they can learn the sounds for individual letters and then blend the sounds together to make the word they see on the page.
We already know that there is more to reading than this straightforward activity. Nevertheless, it is interesting to look in more detail at what is taught in phonics programmes, as letter-sound correspondences are not always as simple as c-a-t in English.
Other Literary Techniques that help young readers
Fiction for young writers will often use tried and tested techniques such as alliteration to interest a new reader and help them remember the sounds associated with certain letters. These include:
  • Alliteration.
  • Pre-modification.
  • Repeated grammatical structures.
  • Assonance.
  • Moral lines.
  • Rhythm.
  • ŸFamiliar discourse patterns.
Methods- actually learning how to read
Although you've never seen the word before, most of all you will be able to guess a pronunciation for smidge. How? There are two principal methods by which a child learns to read. One is the Whole Word approach where a child is taught to recognise the total shape of the word. This method might make use of pictures and labels. The other is the phonic method where a child learns the sound of individual letters and runs them together to form a word, such as m-a-t. What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of both?
Readability
One important aspect of studying children's literature, and for writing for children yourselves, is the concept of readability. Readability is how easy it is to read. The frameworks allow us to be a bit more specific. What might you consider when looking at children's writing? Complete the table.
A framework for analysing children's reading books
Graphology
  • Page layout.
  • Lineation.
  • Pictures.
  • font(s) and size of letters.
Lexis and Semantics
  • Length of words and number of syllables.
  • Types of words and semantic fields.
  • Sounds of words e.g. onomatopoeia, rhyme.
  • Concrete/abstract nouns.
  • Repetition.
  • Ease of recognition (sound-spelling match).
  • How context could help with more difficult words.
Grammar / Syntax
  • Sentence type (simple, compound, complex.
  • Sentence length.
  • Position of subject and verb in sentence.
  • Use of active or passive voice.
  • Verb tense.
  • Modification e.g. adjectives, adverbs.
  • Pronouns used after subject (or object) has been clearly established.
  • Lineation in relation to grammatical units.
Cohesion
  • Careful structuring of sentences to make the text cohesive.
  • Repetition (of words and parts of sentences).
  • Pronouns used after referent well established.
Influences from everyday speech
  • Face to face interactions.
  • Familiar scenarios.
  • Use of direct speech.
  • Informal register.
  • Repetition.
Features borrowed from the oral tradition of story-telling
  • Alliteration (big, bad wolf).
  • Repeated epithet (Little Red Riding Hood).
  • Parallel sentence structures.
  • Rhythmic language.

Trends in Phonological Development
It is difficult to be precise about later phonological development and the way in which vowels and consonants are acquired varies from child to child. When a sound has been mastered, it maybe used only in the pronunciation of certain words and may be missing or pronounced incorrectly in others. Researchers have identified certain trends in phonological development and these are listed below:
  • Command of all the vowels is achieved before all of the consonants
  • By the age of two and a half the average child has mastered all of the vowels and around two thirds of the consonants
  • At four the child is likely to be having difficulty with only a few consonants
  • The child may be six or seven before confidence in using all vowels and consonants has been acquired
  • Consonants are first used correctly at the beginning of words but consonants at the end of words are more difficult for example ‘p’ and ‘b’’ sounds in ‘push’ and ‘bush’ will be easier to pronounce than ‘rip’ and ‘rib’.
  • In general, sounds that occur frequently in a large number of words will be acquired before sounds that occur less frequently
  • To make words easier to say children simplify their pronunciation in certain ways
Ways of Simplification
Deletion:
Children will often simplify pronunciation by deleting certain sounds:
  • Final consonants can be dropped eg) the ‘t’ sound in ‘hat’ and ‘cat’
  • Unstressed syllables are often deleted eg) ‘banana’ becomes ‘nana’
  • Consonant clusters are reduced eg) ‘snake’ becomes ‘nake’ , ‘sleep’ becomes ‘seep’
Substitution
Another form of simplification involves substituting harder sounds with easier ones.
  • R (as in rock or story) becomes w
  • Th (as in there, that or thumb) becomes d, n or f
  • T (as in toe) becomes d
  • P (as in pig) becomes b
Reduplication of sounds is another common phenomenon. This occurs when different sounds in a word are pronounced the same way such as ‘dog’ becoming ‘gog
Undertanding
Berko and Brown (1960) describe how a child referred to a plastic fish as his ‘fis’. When an adult asked ‘is that your fis?’ he replied ‘no, my fis.’ When he was told ‘that is your fish’ he replied ‘yes, my fis.’ Another child confused card/cart and jug/duck in his speech, but when shown pictures of the items, could correctly identify them. This proves that understanding may develop faster than the ability to pronounce things.

Grammatical development:

One word stage / Holophrastic stage
The average child is about a year old when it speaks its first words. Roughly between 12 and 18 months is begins to speak in single word utterances such as ‘milk’ mummy’ and so on. This is known as the ONE WORD STAGE. Occasionally more than one work may appear to be involved but this is because the child has learned the group of words as a single unit and thinks it is all one word. For example: ‘Allgone’.
In many situations the words simply serve a naming function, however, sometimes they convey more complex messages. These words are called HOLOPHRASES. For example, the word ‘juice’ might mean ‘I’ve finished my juice’ or ‘I want more juice’, therefore the single word is taking the place of a more complex grammatical construction that the child hasn’t learned yet.
Two word stage
Two word sentences usually appear when the child is around 18 months old. Usually, the two words are in a grammatically correct sequence such as:
  • Subject + verb - Jenny sleep (Jenny is sleeping)
  • Verb + object Suzy juice (Suzy is drinking juices)
  • Subject + complement Daddy busy (daddy is busy)
Also, when a child tries to repeat what an adult has said, it will miss out part of the sentence, but what is retained is usually grammatically correct:
ADULT: Look Charlie, Ben’s playing in the garden
CHILD: Play garden
This example shows how children in this stage focus on key words. Words that convey less information such as ‘in’ or ‘the’ for example, are missed out.
Confusion as to what a child actually means during the two-word stage can arise because children don’t know tenses or plurals yet. Also, depending on the CONTEXT of the utterance it might have more than one meaning. Take the following example from Bloom (1973):
WHAT WAS SAIDACTIONPOSSIBLE MEANING
Mummy sockChild picks up sockThis is mummy’s sock
Mummy sockMother puts sock on childMummy’s putting my sock on
The Telegraphic Stage
From the age of about 2, children begin producing three and four word utterances. Some will be grammatically complete such as ‘Amy likes tea’ or ‘Mummy sleeps upstairs’ but others will have essential grammatical elements missing such as ‘Daddy home now’ or ‘Laura broke plate’. These utterances are similar to some of those used in the two-word stage – they can often make sense, but key elements are missing such as:
  • Articles – ‘a’ ‘the’
  • Auxiliary verbs – ‘is’ ‘has’
  • Prepositions- ‘to’ ‘on’ ‘for’
  • Conjunctions – ‘but’ ‘because’
Progress during this stage is rapid, and by the age of 5, children have usually mastered sentences containing more than one clause, conjunctions and ‘ing’ ‘ed’ or ‘s’ endings to words and verbs. These are known as inflectional affixes.
Acquistion of Inflections
Research indicates there is a predictable pattern in the acquisition of inflectional affixes. These are word endings such as –ed and –ing. Functional words such as articles like ‘a’ and ‘the’ and also auxiliary verbs seem to be acquired in a regular order.
Brown (1973) studied children’s language development between the ages of 20 months and 36 months and found the sequence shown below occurred regularly. The features are also listed in the order in which they were acquired:
1) –ing
2) plural ‘-s’
3) possessive ‘-s’
4) the, a
5) past tense –ed
6) third person singular verb ending – s (eg): he sings
7) auxiliary verb ‘be’ (eg): I am dancing
Cruttenden (1979) divided the acquisition of inflections into the following three stages:
1) In the first stage, children memorise words on an individual basis
2) In the second stage they show an awareness of the general rules of inflections. They observe that past tense forms usually end in –ed so instead of ‘ran’ they say ‘runned’. This kind of error is known as Overgeneralisation.
3) In the third stage, correct inflections are used
Understanding Grammatical Rules
Children produce accurate grammatical constructions from an early age, and researchers have tried to determine if they have learned this themselves or have copied adult speech. A famous experiment was carried out by Jean Berko (1958) who showed children pictures of fictitious creatures he called ‘Wugs’. At first, the child was shown a picture of one creature and told ‘this is a Wug’. Then, they were shown a picture of two Wugs, and the children were asked to complete the sentence ‘Now there are two…’. Children aged 3 and 4 replied ‘Wugs’. As they could never have heard this word before, it because clear that they were applying the rule that plural end in ‘-s’/ However, children between the ages of 2 and a half and 5 often OVERGENERALISE’ with plurals, so we hear things like ’sheeps’ and mouses’.
Asking Questions
Research suggests this happens in three stages:
1) Relying on intonation in the two-word stage eg: daddy home? Said with a rising tone
2) During their second year children acquire question words such as ‘what’ and ‘where’ resulting in questions such as ‘where daddy gone?’ They can’t yet use auxiliary verbs such as ‘has’
3) In their third year, children can use auxiliary verbs and learn to say ‘is Joe here?’ however, they can’t always use wh-words correctly yet and might say things like ‘why Joe isn’t here?’
Negatives
This also happens in three stages:
1) Words ‘no’ and ‘not’ are used in front of other expressions eg) no want
2) During the third year ‘don’t’ and ‘can’t are used eg) I don’t want it
3) In the third stage more negative forms are acquired such as ‘didn’t’ and ‘isn’t’ and negative constructions are used more accurately.

Pragmatic development: Michael Halliday’s Language functions

FUNCTIONWHAT IT ISWHAT IT’S USED FOR

INSTRUMENTAL
Language used to fulfil a speaker’s needDirectly concerned with obtaining food, drink comfort etc . eg ‘I want’

REGULATORY
Used to influence the behaviour of othersPersuading / commanding / requesting other people do as you want ‘daddy push’ (child on swing)

INTERACTIONAL
Used to develop social relationships and ease interactionThe Phatic dimension of talk eg ‘hello’


PERSONAL
Used to express personal preferences / the speaker’s identitySometimes referred to the ‘here I am!’ function – conveys attitudes, expresses feelings
INFORMATIVEUsed to communicate informationRelaying or requesting information eg ‘I got a new doll

HEURISTIC
Used to learn and explore the environmentUsing language to learn – this may be questions or answers or the kind of running commentary that accompanies child’s play

IMAGINATIVE
used to explore the imaginationMay also accompany play as children create imaginary worlds / may arise from story telling. Also jokes, songs etc
    John Dore’s ‘Infant Language Functions’ is a lot simpler to learn:

    FUNCTION
    EXAMPLE
    LABELLINGNaming or identifying a person, object or experience
    REPEATINGEchoing something spoken by an adult speaker
    ANSWERINGGiving a direct response to an utterance from another speaker
    REQUESTING ACTIONDemanding food, drink, toy, assistance etc
    CALLINGAttracting attention by shouting
    GREETINGPretty self explanatory
    PROTESTINGObjecting to requests etc
    PRACTISINGUsing and repeating language when no adult is present

Tuesday, 16 June 2015

Investigating Language on Twitter

Introduction:
-I have chosen to explore how people with political power use a high level of formality within their tweets
-Compared Ed Millaband with Fearne Cotton
Tweets were picked at rnadom
Methodology:
-Why i am comparing Fearne Cotton with Ed Millaband: both British, both are of a similar age bracket, both have inluential power and are in the public eye
-Picking tweets at random (every 8 tweets) although they will be from a similar time frame (in the last couple of months)
Analysis:
-Fearne more informal (x12 informal English)
-Ed more emotive 12:7
-Fearne uses more 1st person per tweet
-Ed more persuasive/Fearne Discursive
Conclusion/Evaluation:
-Hypothesis is correct
-However, there were many limitations in this investigation one being he small pool of data
-Subjective quantifying e.g. emotive language and formality
-Comparible issues

Wednesday, 15 April 2015

The beginning of a romantic novel


June had never been to a mask ball before, she had never even been to the palace before, she didn’t like going to ball’s especially ones where the Prince was involved and unfortunately this ball was to celebrate the Prince’s 20th birthday. Although she had never met the Prince before, some of her friends had, most of them to be honest, like most Princes she heard that this one was arrogant and selfish; she didn’t want to meet the Prince or congratulate him on his birthday, he’d get plenty of that without her being there, but she had to at least show her face – or that’s what her father said anyhow. June dressed up of course, put her hair up and chose a mask and dress to wear, but she wasn’t planning on dancing or gossiping with people. Like all ball’s, the ladies here were giggling in groups and smirking while looking around at the eligible men and trying to get their attention so one of them will dance with them. June didn’t have any time for this sort of thing, she walked down the staircase looking around for the Prince but she couldn’t see him, she thought she’d look for the largest group of girls she could and he’d have to be in the middle parading himself around like a proud stallion, but all the girls were in little groups and she eventually gave up walking down the rest of the stairs and towards the food. The selection was marvellous, cakes and treats of all sizes, she took a plate and filled it with all the food she could- she’s wearing a mask she thought so no-one would know it was her. Once she’d finished she was feeling warmer, so she headed through one of the bay windows onto the balcony, the views were spectacular- the eye holes she had to look through were tiny so she could hardly see anything, so she tried to take it off; “you’re supposed to keep your mask on you know, it is a mask ball” she turned around in surprise, he was a tall figure and had broad shoulders and dark hair, he looked arrogant just from a glance- June can tell they weren’t going to get on well.

Monday, 6 April 2015

Gender Theories

Deborah Tannen gender theories:
STATUS vs SUPPORT- men are more competitive and want to prevent others from dominating them whereas women seek support and are more consensus
INDEPENDENCE vs INTIMACY- women struggle to preserve intimacy unlike men who focus more on independence
ADVICE vs UNDERSTANDING- to a man a complaint is a challenge to find a solution, but to a women its something to be understood and supportive
INFORMATIVE vs FEELINGS - men are usually brief and to the point and women are emotional and talk about less important things like grooming
ORDERS vs PROPOSALS - women suggest things indirectly (e.g. let's or why dont..?) and men use a direct imperative
CONFLICT vs COMPROMISE - women try to prevent conflicts whereas men prefer to be direct
Robin Lakoff's gender theories:
Some of his basic assumptions about what marks the language of women;
-Women use more hedges in their language e.g. phrases like 'sort of' and 'kind of''
- We include more empty phrases in out language through the use of adjectives like 'lovely' and 'adorable'
- Women are more likely to overuse qualifiers
- Include more tag questions
- As well as indirect commands and requests
- Women also use direct quotations whereas men power phrase
- Females have special lexicon
- Use more 'wh' imperatives e.g. "why dont you open the door?"
- We include more intensifiers
- Women apologize more
- We lack a sense of humor as men are more likely to tell jokes and people laugh than females
Jennifer Coates and Deborah Jones gender theory:
They only look at female conversations
- HOUSE TALK: the exchange of information and resorces connected with a female role as an occupation
- SCANDAL: judging of the behavior of others, women in particular, in terms of domestic morality
- BITCHING: anger at their restricted role and inferior status they want only to make their complaints in that environment to be understood and not necessarily acted upon
- CHATTING: the most intimate form of gossip
Bibliography:
http://www.universalteacher.org.uk/lang/gender.htm

Thursday, 12 March 2015

Example PEE paragraphs for legal text involving Mr Neil

Plan for legal text involving Mr. Neil:

Introductions – context involving the circumstances:
-          Comment on how barrister seems to be interrogating the witness which is Mr Neil-  instead of Mr Peterson who apparently has committed the crime
-          Unequal encounters (Norman Fairclough)
-          Waerings power theories : Political – reflected in the formality of the text
-          Divergence is used to make them stand out from the public -No accents for typical Scottish
Barrister:  
-          Bald on record (politeness strategies)
-          Low frequency lexis to show his power status (this ill feeling, stemmed, incident)
-          Closed questions, even though they are supposed to be interrogative and he is meant to be asking him questions to find out the answers but they are declaratives
-          Instrumental power
-          Patronises Mr Neil – but deontic (degree of obligation to find out the answer) – use of interrogatives
-          Trying to gain influential power
Mr Neil:
-          Overlap a lot trying to save his face by laughing quietly
-          Flouted ‘quality’ and ‘quantity’ maxims – he isn’t giving away much detail
-          Barrister using face threatening acts when questioning Mr Neil
-          Reformation – not giving the information that’s needed
-          Doesn’t really know what to do- barrister knows
Because the barrister is a valued lawyer in the Scottish Court, he holds the most instrumental power against the witness (Mr Neil). Due to this unequal encounter (from the Norman Flairclough’s theory) the Barrister is interrogating the witness by using patronising techniques as well as deontic verbs to forcefully persuade him to answer his questions. Although the case takes place in a Scottish court- we see no sign of the typical Scottish accent- the barrister uses a more ‘upper class’ accent to show off his possibly higher educated background; unlike Mr Neil which uses a variety of conjunctions and fillers which show off his possibly less educated background. The idea of a hierarchy is shown a lot through this conversation, which could possibly effect the final judgment as the jury could be more likely to side with an experienced lawyer who knows what he is talking about rather than a man who is flouting the maxim of quality.
Eventhough the barrister holds the instrumental power he attempts to gain influential power from the jury as well as the public, to defend we assume Mr Peterson. He uses a low frequency lexis of words including “incident”, “stemmed” and “this ill feeling”, to emphasise his political power (Waering’s types of power theories) as well as possibly his high status being a lawyer. Throughout the conversation the barrister tries to patronise Mr Neil by his use of deontic interrogatives, he uses one of Browns and Levinson’s politeness strategies (bald on record), for example in “you put two and two together Mr Neil and made five”, his use of direct address in the pronoun ‘you’ makes it seem as if he is telling Mr Neil off, especially when he says his name, by saying “two and two together and made five” he is humiliating Mr Neil by mocking him and accusing him of making a mistake (which is overall increasing his instrumental  and influential power). He also uses closed questions, even though he is using interrogatives they are really cloaked declaratives- by accusing Mr Neil of committing this crime he is effectively putting ideas into the jury’s head and possibly influencing their overall decision.

Although Mr Neil tries his best to defend himself against this possibly higher educated man, by “(quietly laughing)”, this may have worked if it was just between him and the barrister but with the audience watching them he isn’t likely to gain much influential power; therefore the jury are more likely to agree with the barrister against Mr Neil mainly due to him flouting the maxims of ‘quality’ and ‘quantity’. Mr Neil also overlaps the Barrister frequently – this could be to try and gain some power from him especially when the barrister almost patronises him: “that didn’t cross your mind |at all?|” “|no|”.  Although it doesn’t say how Mr Neil answered the barrister he does make it clear that he’s annoyed by answering in the simple exclamation ‘no’; Mr Neil is showing that he is not to be patronised and succumb to any pressure that the barrister is having, however previously in the text the barrister commented on Mr Neil’s uncertainty of the question: “did the police come to see you?”, Mr Neil answered “no I can’t remember ‘em s-seeing me no” “you can’t remember whether they came to see you |or not?|” “|I don’t| think they did no”, here he succumbed to the barristers question and later on in the text as we saw he almost ‘learnt his lesson’ on how to answer one of the his questions. Mr Neil also uses the technique of reformation , by not telling him the answers the barrister needs it’s making us think that he isn’t to be trusted, moreover his use of fillers and stammers could be because of his nerves or his lack of knowledge of how to act in the Scottish Court. 

Monday, 9 March 2015

H/W due Friday 9th March - Using and explaining theory

Task: Explanation of a term or theory and use of a quote to explore how that term or theory allows us to say something interesting about the language used. Include the context and GAP.
The Unequal encounters is a theory made by Norman Flairclough, overall it tells us that in a conversation there will always be a more powerful, dominant participant. This can be anyone from friends to political people having an argument- society today either make it evident there is a power struggle or they subconsciously comment and make repercussions that can lead to an unequal encounter.  Some things that can be defined as an unequal encounter:
-          Opening and closings of conversations
-          Showing agreement or disagreement
-          Introducing bad news and how they tell it
-          Conversational repair
-          False starts
-          Adjacency pairs
-          Shifting a certain topic
-          How they turn take and speak to one another
Text between a teacher and a student:

Because this text is between a teacher and some students, the teacher holds the instrumental power although Alex challenges his/her authority throughout this encounter. By stating that it’s an unequal encounter it makes the audience assume that people will respect the teacher because she will automatically hold the most power, however what is evident in this text is that Alex is trying to gain the most power and present the teacher as being weaker, but when Alex challenges her by saying “what if I don’t answer?” the teacher replies “Is that a threat? Answer my question”, the powerful imperative ‘answer’ is declaring that Alex need to do what she says. She also uses the personal pronoun ‘my’ to show that he is the one that needs to answer his question and not the other way around; she doesn’t fall into his trap of answering his question instead of him answering her- still making her hold the most power between the two of them. Although we know by the stage direction: “Smiles” that Alex is only jokingly challenging her to see what she would do, the teachers stage direction “(half jokingly)” makes the audience imagine her saying it in a possibly harsher and louder voice- which is what could make Alex’s reply  undermine himself by saying “I don’t know I mean”. 

Wednesday, 25 February 2015

Practicing answering a grouping texts question

English Language - Grouping texts
Texts A, B and D are all adverts to some extent; all the texts are persuading using direct address.
Text D is an advertisement for celebrity cruises – immediately the name of ‘celebrity’ sounds luxurious and makes the audience think that if they go on this cruise they are going to be treated like a celebrity. The bold text of “An all-inclusive cruise exclusively for you” includes the 2nd person pronoun of ‘you’ it encourages the reader to think of themselves on the cruise; as the primary audience for the cruise is most likely to attract more mature adults, celebrity cruises is advertising their product to people who have worked their whole lives and deserve a holiday and to be pampered. ‘Exclusively for you’ implies that the whole cruise is built around them; this technique of hyperbole is linking back linking back to the idea of direct address as its implying they made this cruise for you, although this obviously wasn’t the case its exaggerating the idea of being pampered- as if the members were celebrities. The quote “we’re confident that your first celebrity cruise won’t be your last” is almost inviting them to try it to see if the audience will or not. By including the verb ‘we’re’ they sound more like people and less like a company, similar to Text A  when it comes to Indiana Jones’ nickname.
Another strong inclusion is Text B which is Adidas’s homepage on their website. The first text that stands out to the audience is “Your greatest run ever” the use of the direct address is trying to encourage the audience to imagine their selves running in the new boost shoes. The verb ‘run’ is linking to the connotations of the new boost shoes which are being advertised on this page. The nouns ‘greatest ever’ makes the audience think they have to be the best running shoes ever, similar to Text D, the use of hyperbole again is exaggerating how powerful the trainers are and is advertising them as being the best running trainers ever. Another piece of text that stands out to the audience is “energy takes over #BOOST”, the shoes main target audience would be young adults in their 20’s – a generation known for their social media – by adding ‘#BOOST’ they are persuading people to trend the shoes and make more young people aware of either the brand or the shoes, this will hopefully encourage more people to buy the boost shoes.      
Text A is the weakest inclusion as although it does use some direct address it mainly is informs the audience (families with children) about his adventures and who is in the film; in this text the audience will need some pragmatic understanding about the characters and previous films for them to be interested in watching this film, “in the exiting tradition of the classic Indiana jones movies!” the adjectives ‘classic’ and ‘tradition’ both reference the other films of Indiana Jones- by including ‘classic’ the writers may be trying to appeal to an older audience who watched the films as well as the young audience they are attracting. “Indy takes you on an action-packed adventure”, the pronoun ‘you’ is a form of direct address which is creating imagery as we imagine what adventure that would be, the writer is encouraging the audience to think that the film is taking you with them on the journey. Also by saying Indiana Jones’ nickname of ‘Indy’ instead of his full name sounds like we know him and that he more of a friends than someone just on DVD- this is persuading us to watch the film more.
Text 3, Text 5 and Text 6 are all informative and provide information to the audience through the use of imperatives, interrogatives and statistics.
3 is an advert for the new ‘Flasifeye HD! Mascara’, the pun ‘Falsifeye’ already informs the audience that this is about a mascara giving a false eyelash effect on the eyes and by having the name as an exclamatory sentence it makes it more eye catching. Throughout the text there are imperatives including “Use a twisting action when applying so the lashes are combed and defined…”, this is unusual for a Seventeen advert as its main target audience would appeal to young people however they are advertising the mascara more formally which would apply to more mature women; most people already know how to put mascara on but they are making it sound like it’s an more complicated – they know what they are talking about. The statistics “94% saw more definition*, 93% saw separated lashes*, 92% saw long lasting results*” make the text appear more believable as the audience are more likely to buy a product due to other people’s opinions after using it. The repetition of the verb ‘saw’ shows that the women involved were use to experimenting with different brands of mascara and they do agree with the claims that Seventeen is making about how false this makes your lashes look.
Text 6 mainly uses strong imperatives in the lexical field of cooking to inform the audience (most likely to be older more mature adults) about how to cook using Waitrose Cooks’ Ingredients Tahini. The text starts off by introducing what tahini is and where it is most commonly used in the world, “from the Arabic word for grind” – by saying its ‘Arabic’ the text is informing us about the products history and its making it sound exotic- this creates curiosity in the audiences mind and is encouraging them to use it. The imperatives “Mix”, “blitz” and “try” are all persuading audiences to buy the product as well as possibly other Waitrose ingredients from the recipes; by including a recipe, Waitrose magazine is saying what else you could do with it- its creating this illusion for having multipurpose uses. As this text was found in Waitrose magazine, the audience must already be previous shoppers of the supermarket, but by including a free magazine Waitrose is hopefully encouraging the previous shoppers to come back and possibly buy more exotic and expensive food as well as the essentials.
                Text 6 could be categorised as the weakest inclusion as it doesn’t provide useful information but does provide information about the characters. The transcript is of a spoken conversation between two young adults called Sally and John; they mainly provide information through the use of interrogatives and phatic talk. Unusually for a spoken conversation they don’t start off with saying the usual ‘hello, how are you?’, but instead start off with “So how’s your new job going”, this is showing the audience that they already have a previous relationship before the conversation started and a previous pragmatic understanding that the audience doesn’t know immediately. The informal conjunction ‘so’ tells the audience about the age group of the characters in the text as well as the relationship between them. The lack of punctuation after ‘going’ is a cloaked interrogative, this could possibly show that Sally isn’t interested enough and is just creating chitchat to pass the time. The informality of the transcript is easily shown through the fillers, conjunctions and repairs used such as “no (.) no it’s just like a questionnaire…” which shows John as not being a confident speaker and quite sad- this is unexpected as in the text john says “this week I’ve just been on the phones” where he has to talk to people. Johns back channels as he mainly responds to Sally’s questions, Sally is clearly the one leading the conversation on and is setting the subject matters of which they discuss – in this case mainly about Johns new job and about his friend Gizmo.
Texts 1, 2, 4 and 7 to some extent all share the lexical field of ‘escapism’, the texts present an opportunity to get away from everyday life.
Text 2 is the strongest inclusion of the groups as it is persuading people to go on the cruises and to escape on a “short 2-night sailing to Paris”, by identifying that it’s a ‘short’ cruise they are suggesting that its only two nights- its making it more accessible for the average worker as well as appealing to a more up market and older audience. Lexical word choices like “We’re confident your first Celebrity cruise won’t be your last” encourages people to go on this cruise to almost test it out and to escape to Paris to see if it really is “a unique taste of modern luxury”. Celebrity cruises also used graphology features including pictures to entice people to go on the cruises which they are advertising; the unique Norwegian Fjords are presented in a romantic way similar to Paris, both images include rivers perhaps to reflect peacefulness which is what you could possibly find on the cruise. Both pictures show iconic landmarks which can only be found in these destinations, the idea of exploring somewhere new and seeing something that can’t be found anywhere else is something that would appeal to an audience seeking adventure.
Text 2 was found on Adidas’ website homepage, it is advertising the new boost shoes. “Your greatest run ever” stands out on the homepage, the superlative ‘greatest’ could perhaps mean different things to different people but overall it means that someone succeeded- its suggesting that when you run you will feel better (this could be reflected with the yellow striped backgrounds which has positive connotations with happiness). The bold text “ENERGY TAKES OVER” stands out, by saying something takes over it is implying that there are other things needed to be done- Adidas may be suggesting that when you run you forget all your troubles and just focus on running; the shoes can give enough energy that it does ‘take over’ and ironically you relax while doing exercise-as well as persuading people to buy the shoes it’s also advertising exercise and running through their sports gear.
Text 7 is the back of a travel guide, the main text that stands out to us is “Madagascar” even the title promotes positive connotations for adventure, nature and surrealism; the outlay of the book seems very simple which isn’t something you would normally expect to see for a persuasive text, but this could appeal to a more mature audience- which is who Madagascar is most likely to attract. The text starts off by saying “Practical, informative and user friendly the Globetrotter Travel Guide to Madagascar highlights the major places of interest, describing their principle attractions…” the noun ‘highlights’ suggests that the guide is reliable and factual as it knows the most desired attractions for mature tourists who would like this travel guide- by presenting the guide to be factual it sounds more trustworthy. The noun ‘principle’ also suggests that the book would attract an older audience as it’s a formal word that you wouldn’t expect to hear a young person saying, its persuading people to buy the travel guide but to also go to Madagascar to see the attractions that have been so informative in the book. “Stay, eat, shop and relax”, by ending the paragraph on the verb ‘relax’ it’s creating imagery in the audiences mind as you think about where you are going to relax – normally we think of relaxing as pampering ourselves or escaping from something, the guide is persuading people to go on holiday to Madagascar.

You could argue that Text 1 is the weakest inclusion of the group as action films like Indiana Jones take the audience on someone else’s ‘reality’ or adventure, it’s not as such their own escape. “STEVEN SPIELBURG AND GEOGE LUCAS bring you the greatest adventure of all”, the phrase ‘bring you’ shows that they have already planned your escapism- films take you on a journey, they present an idea to the audience which  and the films leave little to the viewers imagination. 

Thursday, 12 February 2015

Grouping persuasive texts

Texts A, B, C and D share either a primary or secondary purpose to persuade. The texts are all adverts to some extent and appear either online or on a product. The use of strong hyperbole in the texts share the technique of hyperbole: A refers to its “unique, precious blend of Moroccan argon oils which instantly penetrates the hair shaft” to connect with the connotations for the product renewing your hair and the way it does it- it even connects with the idea of exotic treatments being a remedy for damaged hair; the use of the phrase ‘hair shaft’ seems factual and intelligent and the audience will possibly think that they know what they are talking about. Texts B and D’s referencing to famous actors or companies will present the texts in a more reliable way, B’s “Pat Solatano (Bradley Cooper) … Tiffany (Academy Award Winner, Jennifer Lawrence)”, the graphology of the names of the famous actors stand out – this will stand out to the audience against less well-known actors in other films. Text D uses references shops and social media sites like Twitter and Facebook to ‘repost’ and advertise Jamie Oliver’s recipes, by having hyperlinks to major supermarkets like Asda and Tesco adults are more inclined to get their ingredients from those store for Jamie’s recipes. Text C is a weak inclusion for this group, as for a persuasive piece you usually see a variety of imperatives but in this text there is only one saying “read more”, however similar to text D there is a lot of hyperbole used to describe the recipes including “Ultimate quesadillas” – exaggerating how good they are will entice the readers to make him food.